https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Legal Briefs / Other Briefs RSS ← Back
Alexkor|Arbitration|Labour Law|CCMA|CEO SA|Labour Appeal Court|Labour Court
||
alexkor|arbitration|labour-law|ccma|ceo-sa|labour-appeal-court|labour-court
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Pre-Arbitration Minutes: Lessons from Alexkor Ltd v Mervyn Carstens


Close

Pre-Arbitration Minutes: Lessons from Alexkor Ltd v Mervyn Carstens

Should you have feedback on this article, please complete the fields below.

Please indicate if your feedback is in the form of a letter to the editor that you wish to have published. If so, please be aware that we require that you keep your feedback to below 300 words and we will consider its publication online or in Creamer Media’s print publications, at Creamer Media’s discretion.

We also welcome factual corrections and tip-offs and will protect the identity of our sources, please indicate if this is your wish in your feedback below.


Close

Embed Video

Pre-Arbitration Minutes: Lessons from Alexkor Ltd v Mervyn Carstens

Legal gavel

29th May 2026

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

At its very nature, concluded pre-arbitration minutes are signed agreements. They are beneficial in the arbitration process as they clarify issues in dispute, set crucial deadlines, encourage efficiency and transparency and assist the commissioner. Once parties sign and file these pre-arbitration minutes, it is ordinarily accepted that parties may not deviate from this agreement. There have been instances where parties enter into these agreements and seek to amend these agreements during the arbitration proceedings.

This article now considers whether pre-arbitration minutes can be amended once filed, and the scope of a commissioner’s powers in this regard. To illustrate these issues, we turn to an important judgment.

Advertisement

In Alexkor Ltd v Mervyn Carstens, the parties had concluded and signed a pre-arbitration minute. After appointing new attorneys, the company sought to have the minutes set aside, arguing that they were inaccurate and that its previous attorneys had not been mandated to conclude them. The presiding commissioner dismissed the application.

The company then approached the Labour Court, seeking the minutes to be declared invalid and set aside. The Labour Court, however, held that:

Advertisement
  • Pre-arbitration minutes concluded between parties remain binding.
  • The validity of such minutes is a matter for the Labour Court, not the CCMA.
  • The court itself could not interfere with a concluded pre-arbitration minute.

The application was dismissed, and the Labour Appeal Court upheld the decision.

The Powers of Commissioners

The authority of commissioners is clearly defined in section 142 of the Labour Relations Act (LRA). Commissioners are required to act strictly within the provisions of the LRA and the CCMA Code of Conduct. This means that:

  • Commissioners cannot perform functions beyond the scope of their statutory powers.
  • They do not have the authority to amend a binding pre-arbitration minute that the parties have voluntarily signed.
  • Any attempt to do so would amount to acting ultra vires.

The Alexkor judgment reaffirms the binding nature of pre-arbitration minutes and clarifies that once signed, these minutes carry legal weight and remain in force. For this reason, parties should approach pre-arbitration minutes with diligence.

Tips:

  • Treat pre-arbitration minutes as binding agreements.

Once signed, pre-arbitration minutes carry legal weight and cannot simply be amended during arbitration. Employers must ensure that they fully understand and agree to the content before signing, as later challenges are unlikely to succeed.

  • Prepare thoroughly before concluding pre-arbitration minutes.

Because commissioners lack the authority to alter these agreements, employers should approach the process with diligence, verify mandates, check accuracy, and confirm alignment with the case strategy. This prevents costly disputes and procedural setbacks later on.

Written by Thina Madubela, Dispute Resolution Official, CEO SA

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      ARTICLE ENQUIRY      FEEDBACK

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here


About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za