- Mahlalela v Office of the Pension Fund Adjudicator (J283/2011) [2011] ZALCJHB 430.07 MB
Introduction
1. It has been brought to my attention that there is an obvious error in paragraph [10] of the judgment in this matter which was handed down on 23 February 2011. The following sentence appears in paragraph [10] of the judgment:
“When this application was finally brought, the applicant challenged the impending disciplinary enquiry itself which he had any length of on 10 February 2011.”
(emphasis added)
2. The underlined portion is clearly nonsensical and an obvious typographical error, not picked up in final editing.
3. Accordingly, paragraph [10] of the judgment is amended by the substitution of the sentence above with the following:
“When this application was finally brought, the applicant challenged the impending disciplinary enquiry itself which he had received notice of on 10 February 2011.”
EMAIL THIS ARTICLE SAVE THIS ARTICLE
To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here