Localisation has become a major concern across the development and humanitarian sectors. It is driving donor efforts to increase direct access for local actors to donor resources, as well as promoting local leadership and knowledge in donor-funded programming. Despite widespread enthusiasm for more locally led ways of working, progress has been slow and significant barriers remain.

This paper examines the barriers bilateral donors face in their efforts to promote locally led practices in climate adaptation, where specific commitments have been made to the Principles for Locally Led Adaptation. We examine initiatives in Uganda, drawing on interviews with three bilateral donors (the US, UK and Sweden) and Ugandan stakeholders (government, civil society, academia).

We find that donors face five central barriers: risk aversion, administrative challenges, dual accountabilities, divergent values and power asymmetries. These barriers interact with the specific political and socioeconomic context of Uganda to determine how and how far donors are able to achieve their localisation goals.

Report by the Overseas Development Institute