![Helen Suzman Foundation v Judicial Service Commission and Others (145/2015) [2016] ZASCA 161](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized/0000603229_resized_lawofficeb1022.jpg)
- Helen Suzman Foundation v Judicial Service Commission and Others (145/2015) [2016] ZASCA 1610.22 MB
Recording of the private deliberations on judicial appointments by the Judicial Service Commission, properly conducted in terms of the Judicial Service Commission Act 9 of 1994 and regulation 3(k) made thereunder, does not form part of the record of its proceedings for purposes of Uniform rule 53(1)(b) – constitutional principles of openness and accountability are not absolute and the JSC is entitled to raise the defence of confidentiality to a rule 53 demand for the disclosure of the recordings of its private deliberations.
EMAIL THIS ARTICLE SAVE THIS ARTICLE
To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here
