https://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Legal Briefs / Bowmans RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Embed Video

Criminal liability in South Africa for cartel conduct from 1 May 2016

Criminal liability in South Africa for cartel conduct from 1 May 2016

26th April 2016

By: Sane Dhlamini
Creamer Media Senior Contributing Editor and Researcher

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

As of 1 May 2016, certain sections of the Competition Amendment Act (Act), providing for criminal liability of individuals who act in contravention of the Act, will become effective.

Tamara Dini, partner in Bowman Gilfillan Africa Group's Competition and Regulatory Practice, explains that sections 73A (1), (2), (3) and (4) of the Competition Amendment Act relate to criminal liability for individuals in relation to contraventions of the Competition Act.

“In particular, these sections allow for directors and managers to be held criminally liable for causing a company to engage in, or “knowingly acquiescing” to a company's involvement in, price-fixing, market division or collusive tendering.  Individuals may face personal penalties of up to R 500,000 or 10 years’ imprisonment,” she explains.

Dini notes that “criminal liability for cartel conduct applies in a number of jurisdictions, but the introduction of criminal liability in South Africa seems to be premature.  For example, aspects of the Competition Act itself have not been fully interpreted by the Competition Tribunal or the Competition Appeal Court and to impose criminal liability on individuals in these circumstances raises questions.” 

"Importantly, she notes, “South Africa's legislation providing for criminal liability has been widely criticized, including by the Competition Commission and the Competition Tribunal, who will be tasked with enforcing the new criminal liability provisions. In particular, the sections of the Act prohibiting companies from directly or indirectly paying the fines, as well as the legal costs, of any employees who were convicted of cartel conduct were identified as possibly being unconstitutional.  As such, criminal cases pursued against individuals may be met by individuals raising constitutional law defences.”
 

Advertisement

 

Submitted by Bowman Gillian Africa Group

Advertisement

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za