Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
28 March 2017
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
Embed Code Close
content
 
  Map
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
Related social media terms:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DOWNLOAD
 

The question for decision in this appeal is whether a contract between the former Government of South Africa, and the first respondent, Total South Africa (Pty) Ltd (Total), continues to bind the appellant, Transnet Soc Ltd (Transnet), a wholly-owned government company, despite the change in legislative regime that governs the transport and conveyance of fuel in South Africa. Coppin J in the Gauteng Local Division of the High Court (to which I shall refer for convenience as ‘the high court’) was asked and agreed to determine a number of issues arising from pleadings in an action between the parties separately from others in terms of rule 33(4) of the Uniform Rules of Court.

Before setting out the issues that the high court was asked to determine, it is useful to discuss briefly the background to the conclusion of the contract and to the litigation between the parties. For the purpose of determining whether the contract survived the change in regime regulating conveyance of fuels and the charges for it, the parties assumed certain facts alleged in the particulars of claim to be correct. And the evidence confirming these facts by a witness for Total, Mr R Duchateau, was not contested by Transnet.

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
Comment Guidelines (150 word limit)
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
Company
 
Continent
 
Country
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association
Close