Policy, Law, Economics and Politics - Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
This privately-owned website is operated and maintained by Creamer Media
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
26 May 2017
 

 

Opinion expressed in these articles does not necessarily reflect that of the publisher.
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
Embed Code Close
content
 
  Map
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advertisements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Related social media
 
 
Related social media terms:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DOWNLOAD
 

We are meeting here in Lhasa, the capital of the Autonomous Region of Tibet as intellectuals to discuss opportunities and challenges enjoyed and faced by the People’s Republic of China in the struggle for the development of Tibet. This  invitation by the State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China, through its Director-General, Lu Guangjin, to the Fourth Forum on the Development of Tibet, China is highly appreciated. It provides us with the opportunity not only to present and share our views as intellectuals on the theme of the Fourth Forum on the Development of Tibet, “Opportunities and Challenges for the Development of Tibet,” but also with the opportunity to see Tibet and its people. Edward Said, who best and effectively represented the people of Palestine as an intellectual doing research and lecturing at the universities in the United States of America until he passed away on 25 September 2003 and, as an independent member of the Palestinian National Council from 1977 to 1991, articulated opportunities and challenges enjoyed and faced by intellectuals in representing the people in the strategic area of development.  According to Robert Fisk, he was “the most powerful political voice” for Palestinian people.  In his Reith Lectures of 1993 published as a book, Representations of the Intellectual, Said defines the intellectual as:

an individual endowed with a faculty for representing, embodying, articulating a message, a view, an attitude, philosophy or opinion to, as well as for, a public. And this role has an edge  to it,  and cannot  be played   without a sense  of being  someone whose place  it is publicly  to raise  embarrassing questions, to  confront orthodoxy and dogma (rather than to produce them),  to be  someone who cannot  easily be co-opted  by governments or corporations, and whose  raison d’eter  is to  represent  all those  people and issues that are routinely  forgotten or swept under the rug. The intellectual does so on the basis of universal principles: that all human beings are entitled to expect decent standards of behaviour concerning freedom and justice from worldly powers or nations, and that deliberate or inadvertent violations of these standards need to be tested and fought against courageously.

Download the full article above.

Written by Sehlare Makgetlaneng, PhD, Chief Research Specialist Programme Leader: Governance and Security, Africa Institute of South Africa – part of the Human Sciences Research Council

Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
 
Comment Guidelines (150 word limit)
 
 
 
 
  Topics on this page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Online Publishers Association
Close