http://www.polity.org.za
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Case Law / Magistrates Courts RSS ← Back
Business|SMS|University Of Cape Town
Business|SMS|University Of Cape Town
business|sms|university-of-cape-town
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Verification Image. Please refresh the page if you cannot see this image.

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Case Law: Wood / University of Cape Town [2014] 3 BALR 310 (CCMA)

Verification Image. Please refresh the page if you cannot see this image.
Close

Embed Video

Case Law: Wood / University of Cape Town [2014] 3 BALR 310 (CCMA)

5th May 2014

SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

Towards the end of 2011 a situation of incompatibility arose between the applicant and two of his colleagues in the respondent’s Graduate School of Business. The respondent proposed that the applicant be transferred (with no loss of benefits) to the School of Management Studies in the Commerce Faculty, which the applicant was not willing to accept as according to him, the transfer amounted to an unfair demotion.

Referring to Grogan (Dismissal, Discrimination and Unfair Labour Practices (1ed page 54) the commissioner held:

Advertisement

“A demotion occurs if the change to the employee’s terms and conditions of employment are such that they result in a material reduction of the employee’s remuneration, responsibilities or status.  A demotion does not occur merely because the employee is placed in a post involving slightly different work, especially when that work falls within the scope of the employee’s duties.  The mere fact that an employee’s title and remuneration remains the same is not necessarily proof that a demotion has not occurred.”

The commissioner was not convinced that the transfer constituted a demotion - however, even if it did, the commissioner was satisfied that it was not an unfair demotion. The fairness of the transfer must be judged with reference to the interests of both parties.  The competing interests of the parties must be balanced. The respondent would suffer more harm if the applicant were to return to the GSB, than the applicant would suffer by remaining at the SMS.

The transfer which was neither unfair conduct in relation to demotion, nor unfair disciplinary action short of dismissal, was a sensible and fair response by the respondent to an operational problem. The referral of an unfair labour practice was therefore dismissed.

By Nicolene Erasmus

First published on SA Labour Guide

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options